the end of NARAL?

2005
08.19

the recent debacle over NARAL’s attack ad on Robert’s nomination is a clear sign that the pro-choice movement will do anything to protect Roe v Wade. Even in his resignation over the controversy, David E. Seldin, NARAL’s communication director, defended the ad with a ‘100 percent accurate’ disclaimer. McElroy, the editor of iFeminists.com, a well known feminist, refused to be associated with the movement and the ad. She claimed that the abortion debate is ‘intellectually bankrupt’ as revealed by the ad.

So why did NARAL spend $500,000 budget on the ad, just to later retracted it and hoped it will fade away. Because it wants to keep the debate alive, even through blunder and slander.

This will mark the beginning of the end for NARAL’s support among the left-wing American women. Mark my word, they have usurped the trust these people have given to the organisation and chipped it away at any cost.

The next time when Sen Clinton announces her candidacy for the highest office, she will be quick to disassociate herself with the movement. The movement is not only morally corrupt, it is dangerous. No wonder Frost (D) has been making claim, ‘the religious faith does not belong to just one party’. It is nice to hear rethorical change in the way the Dems is approaching US politics, far removed from the flip-floppy nature made famous by the defeated-former-presidential-candidate Sen Kerry. Obviously, only now they realise that they no longer represent the majority of the people. My response, where is the action? Dems, its time for a change!

Your Reply